A response to the article, Shared Readings: Modeling Comprehension, Vocabulary, Text Structures, and Text Features for Older Readers, by: Douglas Fisher, Nancy Frey, Diane Lapp
I could not agree more with this article. I absolutely believe that modeling reading is an imperative aspect of literacy instruction. I just wish that when I was in elementary school my teachers were using these strategies. Nevertheless, it is up to current educators and pre-service teachers to implement these affective, research based methods in the classroom.
My mom was very influential in my reading success. She did a lot a lot to develop my reading literacy, one of which was informing me of how to use the content of the story to my advantage when I was having trouble understanding certain textual elements. She taught me how to use context clues to help me understand words while reading, and also how to use additional resources, like a glossary, when context clues were not enough. No matter where these skills are developed, school or home, it is important that classroom teachers are modeling them in all aspects of their instruction.
Lastly, model, model, model is all I can say. This article does well in proving that students learn through their observations of others. It all goes back to the age-old saying, “Practice what you preach.” I mean if you are telling your students that these are key components of literacy comprehension that they should practice, well then why not model ways in which they can apply these strategies? I believe it is important for teachers to help their students understand that these “self-monitoring reading strategies” are ones they will use all throughout their lives.
-MLH